Principle of the prohibition of illegal events

a preliminary analysis of the theory of proportionality and the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice

Authors

  • Emilly de Figueiredo Barelli Ivy Enber Christian University
  • Viviane Bastos Machado UENF

Keywords:

illicit evidence, proportionality, due process of law

Abstract

Through the deductive method, the present work aims to expose constitutional and infraconstitutional aspects about the use of illegal evidence in the criminal process, demonstrating the horizontality of the roll in the state the part of the court process, and must pass through the sieve of fair trial and constitutional principles, with the purpose of guaranteeing to the individual the tools for the substantive contradictory effect, deepening the subject further, and the special resource analyzed number 1,630,097 - RJ, wich deals with the prohibition of the use of the illicit evidence in a specific case judged by the court of the Superior Court of Justice, thus demonstrating the scope of applicability of the norm presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Emilly de Figueiredo Barelli, Ivy Enber Christian University

    Law Graduate

  • Viviane Bastos Machado, UENF

    Master in Cognition and Language-UENF, teacher at the Universidade Iguaçu – Campus V.

References

ALVES, Leonardo Barreto Moreira. Processo Penal Parte Geral. 7ª edition. Publishing Company JusPodivm: Salvador, 2017.

BASTOS, Celso Ribeiro de. Curso de direito constitucional. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1993.

BRASIL. Código Penal. Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Vademecum. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017.

_______. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Vademecum. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017.

________. Presidência da República. Código de Processo Penal. Available in: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/Del3689Compilado.htm. Acessed on: August 10, 2018.

CAPEZ, Fernando. Curso de Processo Penal. 20 ed. 2013.

JOBIM, Marco Felix; REIS, Maurício Martins. O Direito de Permanecer em silêncio: Miranda v. Arizona. Available in: https://app.vlex.com/#vid/449148666. Acessed on August 14, 2018.

ROVER, C. de. Para servir e proteger: direitos humanos e direito internacional humanitário para as forças policiais e de segurança. DHnet, 1995. Available in: http://www.dhnet.org.br/dados/manuais/dh/mundo/rover/index.html. Acessed on August 30, 2018.

SANTOS, Lara Cíntia de Oliveira. A evolução do Processo Penal e os meios de prova. In: Âmbito Jurídico, Rio Grande, XIV, n. 90, jul. 2011. Available in: http://www.ambitojuridico.com.br/site/index.php?n_link=revista_artigos_leitura&artigo_id=9773. Acessed on: August 15, 2018.

STJ. RECURSO ESPECIAL: REsp: 1630097 RJ 2016/0260240-6, Relator: Ministro Joel Ilan Paciornik, Date of Judgment: 18/04/2017. JusBrasil, 2017. Available in: https://stj.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/465733222/recurso-especial-resp-1630097-rj-2016-0260240-6/relatorio-e-voto-465733247. Acessed on: August 10, 2018.

TORRES, Bolivar. Serendipidade: encontros com o acaso. Available in: http://globo.globo.com/blogs/prosa/posts/2014/03/15/serendipidade-encontros-com-acaso-527647.asp. Acessed on: May 18, 2018.

ZORZAN, Gilcinéia. A evolução da prova ilícita no processo penal brasileiro. In: Âmbito Jurídico, Rio Grande, XVII, n. 128, set. 2014. Available in: http://www.ambitojuridico.com.br/site/?n_link=revista_artigos_leitura&artigo_id=15179. Acessed on: August 16, 2018.

Published

2023-08-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Principle of the prohibition of illegal events: a preliminary analysis of the theory of proportionality and the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice. (2023). IVY ENBER SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, 3(1), 282-324. https://www.enberuniversity.com/revista/index.php/ies/article/view/140

Similar Articles

1-10 of 43

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.